One thing no one has taken into consideration relative to the light stamp of the 1 and 6, is the proximity to the butterfly stitching. Why it was stamped there I have no idea.
Joe,
How unusual is it that numbers were stamped inside the butterfly on a JRB baby dot? Have you seen this before? I don't recall seeing it on other JRB sheaths, but I probably wasn't paying attention.
My guess is Bo had a #5 forging sitting there and wanted to get a "fighter" out to the general, threw a double hilt on it, an ivory handle and wa la, out the door.
I don't think it was a decision based on weeks of thought and debate.
On the other hand, deciding on a knife to give a General doesn't strike me as a spur of the moment thing where you just grab whatever is laying around. Oh well, perhaps we will learn more as this story unfolds.
_________________________
Jim E.
“If you don’t know where you are going, you might wind up someplace else.” – Yogi Berra
I guess what I was trying to say is that maybe it really wan't important that it was a #1 or #5 as it is a presentation piece if you will. They both would be equal in form for sure and function for all practical purposes, but I highly doubt Bo gave him a knife that he thought would see "action". So in the end, maybe aesthetics (form) ruled the day.
One thing no one has taken into consideration relative to the light stamp of the 1 and 6, is the proximity to the butterfly stitching. Why it was stamped there I have no idea.
Joe,
How unusual is it that numbers were stamped inside the butterfly on a JRB baby dot? Have you seen this before? I don't recall seeing it on other JRB sheaths, but I probably wasn't paying attention.
When you see it you kinda go hmmm. Then the more you look at it you start to question whether it is the first time. As I sit here I want to say maybe I have seen another over the years, I seem to recall it through the fog, but then again, maybe not.