5

Screw it! We're building "both"! One caveat: No CW! I'll get working on doing a little "squeezing" to get the slots open for a 2-knife build. Hell, I don't want to be a hypocrite! "I" use both! (Just ask James)...
Now: What do you guys (& girl) think about the raffle system for this build as well? It seems to generate more interest and participation.
Let me know: ROLL CALL VOTE:
A) 100 raffle number
B) Leave it like the "old" builds.
Stay sharp, Capt. Chris
PS: MY "Tandem"!

A

Is 100 enough to cover the cost?

He does use both... I've seen it AND participated in it!

A if that is enough slots for the build.
Walker

I thought it was a new vote for either a 5 or 3.

Pap

Mike:
Read the posts. We couldn't get a winner. We're making both your #5 and also a #3.
Best, Capt. Chris

OK CREW,
Thanks for your input so far. We are building a tandem hunting set: The Model #3, HUNTER and the Model #5, CAMP & TRAIL. For some of the newcomers, here's a quick rundown.
Model #3's are available in 5, 6 & 7" blade lengths. All are forged from 1/4 inch stock and either carbon (O1 tool steel) or stainless (440B) are doable.
Model #5's are available in 4,5,6,7 & 8" blade length. All but the 4" version are forged from 1/4" stock, with the little guy made out of 3/16" stock, and carbon or stainless is available on all models.
I don't care what we build. If we decide on a 4" camp & trail and a 5" hunter or an 8" camp & trail and a 7" hunter...it matters not to me. My pair match, i.e. same blade length and options, etc... THESE DON'T HAVE TO!
OK: Let's get started. Speak yer' peace and give us your opinion as to what you like and why!
Thanks, Capt. Chris
PS: I am thinking about offering raffle chances for this set 1-100 numbers @ $15.00 per chance or 4 for $50.00. What do ya'll think of that idea?...CCS

Spot on with the raffle IMO.

As far as blades go, I like a 3-5, and a 5-6. Don't care about stainless or not. If we opted for a 3-6 or 3-7, we could get a #6 grind.

A) 100 raffle number