dominionhobby.com Clinton Knives
The RANDALL KNIFE FORUMS

A place where EVERYBODY is welcome to join in on the discussion of Randall Made knives


Page 4 of 8 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 >
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#96367 - 12/09/11 03:25 PM Re: Stainless versus Carbon Blades - Randall of Co * [Re: JohnM]
Leatherman Offline
Knife Enthusiast

Registered: 01/06/06
Posts: 1371
Loc: IL
As far as I am concerned carbon has no benefits. It rusts and stains so easy, pretty much every time you use it you will be able to see something. Carbon sharpens faster than stainless but I don't always see that as a benifit as it is a little softer. They are both tough as nails in the field. I have battoned both through seasoned white oak and they held tough.

I have nothing against carbon but I see no advantage.
_________________________
Ben

Top
#96377 - 12/09/11 10:34 PM Re: Stainless versus Carbon Blades - Randall of Co [Re: Maconace]
Neil Offline
Knife Enthusiast

Registered: 10/27/11
Posts: 54
I think the high carbon steel is marginally harder near the edge than a high carbon stainless blade; it would be interesting to do a Rockwell test on both. Perhaps there may be some difference in toughness as well. Why not call Randall and ask them?

Regards, Neil Tucson, AZ

Top
#96378 - 12/09/11 10:57 PM Re: Stainless versus Carbon Blades - Randall of Co [Re: Neil]
Leatherman Offline
Knife Enthusiast

Registered: 01/06/06
Posts: 1371
Loc: IL
I am 99% sure the rc is 56-57 on the carbon and 57-58 on the stainless
_________________________
Ben

Top
#96380 - 12/10/11 01:25 AM Re: Stainless versus Carbon Blades - Randall of Co [Re: Leatherman]
kalervo Offline
Knife Enthusiast

Registered: 09/28/10
Posts: 1077
Hmm. dont realy know but it's easy to harden high carbon steel to 58-60 hrc and even harder.. The stainless Randall I have seems to be a little bit softer in steel than the o1 steel.
_________________________
Sweden
Knifemaker
shag #29

Top
#96388 - 12/10/11 01:52 PM Re: Stainless versus Carbon Blades - Randall of Co [Re: kalervo]
JR3 Offline
Knife Enthusiast

Registered: 01/02/11
Posts: 78
Loc: Northeast USA
I am no Randall collector nor do I have the vast knowledge as most of you here, but when is the last time you saw a failure with carbon blades. I cant recall any. Guys like the late Ron Hood (survival instructor) used his carbon 8 inch model 1 hard with out failure. The story is it was a replacement due to him breaking a stainless model. Anyway, stories are just that unless seen first hand. My first hand experience was with a model 14 in stainless. No matter how hard I tried I could not keep it sharp. Finally sold it to an Army Captain who put it in his safe. Carbon trumps stainless anything in performance, strength and ease of sharpening. Period.
_________________________
Matt

Top
#96394 - 12/10/11 04:04 PM Re: Stainless versus Carbon Blades - Randall of Co [Re: JR3]
alan_grombacher Offline
Knife Enthusiast

Registered: 08/20/07
Posts: 1038
Loc: Canada
I like carbon blades, but do have and use some stainless blades too. I do like the character that the patina gives a carbon blade.

I like stainless for flyfishing, steelheading, and duck hunting when everything is likely to get wet at some point. My knives are usually on my belt, so wading does get them wet.

I have never had a issue sharpening my Randalls, but my buddies have noticed that they sharpen theirs more than I do mine during the season. My #23 and #11 really hold an edge, and so does my old #8 (stainless) with popcorn stag (which I gave to my buddy last year).

Alan Grombacher
RKS#5531
_________________________
Alan Grombacher
RKCC-CMI-010
RKS#5531

Top
#96398 - 12/10/11 04:51 PM Re: Stainless versus Carbon Blades - Randall of Co [Re: alan_grombacher]
Leatherman Offline
Knife Enthusiast

Registered: 01/06/06
Posts: 1371
Loc: IL
_________________________
Ben

Top
#96400 - 12/10/11 06:08 PM Re: Stainless versus Carbon Blades - Randall of Co [Re: Leatherman]
pappy19 Offline
Knife Enthusiast

Registered: 10/31/07
Posts: 7438
Loc: Garden Valley, Idaho
Unless a Randall is totally wacked out, my experience has been using a good steel or the Diamond Edge, will bring back a Randall edge almost immediately. Done it many, many times on game and just using them, whether it be carbon or stainless. If you get them real dull, then, I agree, it is difficult, but after obtaining a Warthog sharpener, it is no problem any longer. Once you try one, you will throw rocks at your Landsky.

Pap
_________________________
Mike Allen
RKCC-CM-086
True West Magazine Maniac
Randall Collector
Behring Made Collector
Ruana Collector
Glock Fan
NRA- Life Member since 1975
mikenlu99@aol.com

Top
#96402 - 12/10/11 06:24 PM Re: Stainless versus Carbon Blades - Randall of Co [Re: pappy19]
Leatherman Offline
Knife Enthusiast

Registered: 01/06/06
Posts: 1371
Loc: IL
I use a Norton professional natural tri stone set. Very handy and works great
_________________________
Ben

Top
#96411 - 12/10/11 09:18 PM Re: Stainless versus Carbon Blades - Randall of Co [Re: Leatherman]
Tom Vaught Offline
Knife Enthusiast

Registered: 04/26/10
Posts: 574
Loc: Michigan
I have several carbon blade knives, some several years old. NO RUST SPOTS and the blades look new on most of them. Then I have purchased from others knives like a model #27 or a AG Russell numbered knife that had tiny rust spots or rust cracks in the blade. I doubt if either of those knives were ever used so what is the deal?

Tom Vaught


Edited by Tom Vaught (12/10/11 09:19 PM)
_________________________
Tom Vaught
RKS# 5100

Top
Page 4 of 8 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 >


Moderator:  Mr_Mod